Well, I’ve spent some time placing together a few well-intentioned ideas that I had into a digestible document. This is the product and below is a sample paragraph from the introduction:
Democracy, similar to evolution, is an inherently flawed system. The subscription to the idea that a government of the people is, in theory, the most rational and most candid system of government to operate is more than reasonable; particularly in comparison to other forms of government. However, without carefully reasoned, well-intentioned and periodically modernized mechanisms in place, a democracy can begin to work against the very people that the system aims to protect. Subsequently, while most modern democracies have long implemented legal affirmations of popular liberties like: freedom of speech, freedom of press, freedom to peacefully assemble, the right to participate in fair and free elections and freedom from government abuses, there are still many matters that need to be addressed. Democracy likely cannot be perfected, but that should not be the goal. Democracy can be made fairer, egalitarian, and better equipped to stand the test time. And also, like evolution, there should be room for adaptation.
It’s completely free, so run over to Smashwords and download it.
Before you jump to any conclusions about this little rant, I should first say a few things:
1. Going into Iraq was probably one of the worst foreign policy decisions the U.S. could have made.
2. Staying in Iraq too long will not help foreign policy objectives in the future.
3. Leaving too early will only help to destabilize an all ready unstable area.
4. America’s domestic safety is not directly linked to leaving Iraq. Continue reading
PUMA. You’re probably thinking “it’s gotta be about sports.” But, unfortunately I’m not. However, to help make a point I will begin with sports logic.
When it comes to bitter sports rivals there is usually questionable logic applied when one team loses. To clarify, say the Jets beat the Dolphins in the playoffs, usually either people support the Jets because they are in the same division and it makes them look better for losing to them. Or, they support the other team because they’d rather see someone else win than watching their rivals happy.
I can see your mind working. It makes sense, right? It makes sense in both cases for…..SPORTS!!!
However, PUMA is an acronym for a new political action party. It stands for Party Unity My Ass. Though on weak legs, the movement is compromised of Hillary Clinton loyalists and other liberals that believe it would be better to see John McCain win in November than Barack Obama.
From what I understand, PUMA is mostly women’s rights and gay rights advocates that feel they were victims of discriminatory sentiment from the Obama campaign. Now, while that claim is debatable, there is something that I just don’t understand. Why would a group of women’s and gay rights advocates try to vote in a member of the party that has not supported those rights? And worse, a person who upholds those party viewpoints.
These Liberals are being a little ridiculous about this. Ok, Hillary lost and it was a tough fight, but this “enemy of my enemy is friend” logic, or this “I don’t want to see my closest competitor win” sports logic has no place in intellectual politics. It’s petty, illogical and moronic. If I were a disgruntled Liberal I wouldn’t bet on the fact that McCain and the Conservatives would treat my values better than Obama.
PUMA renames itself to People United for Moronic Actions! They realize that they are morons and yet are still motivated to continue. Awesome!
A little while back, I wrote about “the Things America has Forgotten”. While that list very truncated, it provided a good foundation upon which I will again complain about the things America has lost sight of.
Only the oblivious could miss the direction I will be moving toward but I’ll ask again, did we forget about Africa? First, to all of you that’s first reaction is, “who cares about Africa?”, you are the imbeciles this is written for. Second, to all of you that said, “man, you are so right!”, thanks for returning to soak up some of my outrage. Continue reading
Naturally, this list can be as long as my arm but for now, here are the first three that come to mind.
The first: What ever happened to the “beacon on a hill” ideal that the country was founded on? Where did that “lead by example” approach that was intended to separate the American life from that of the rest of the world (especially Europe) go? Increasingly we are looking like hypocrites that have abandoned our morals to chase down that all-mighty dollar. I shan’t go into details here, but ask yourself, if we are truly attempting to lead by example, what example are we setting for the rest of the world? Arrogance? Belligerence? Egotism? Continue reading